GLP-1 Evidence

Not medical advice. A record of published research and our assessments of it. The limits

Liraglutide in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a phase 2b clinical trial

Design
Randomized trial · 204 participants · Mixed outcome
Match to healthy normal-weight adults aged 55–75
Partial matchNon-diabetic older adults not selected for weight, but with established AD.
Could weight loss explain it?
Unlikely[Auto] Not addressed in abstract.
Study tier
Study tier 3Phase 2b with a null imaging primary endpoint and a nominally significant secondary.
Assessment
Version 2 · curated · Sep 13, 2026

Study facts come from the paper. Population match, weight-loss explanation and study tier are our judgments, made against the reference group of healthy normal-weight adults aged 55–75.

In 204 non-diabetic people with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's, a year of liraglutide did not change brain glucose metabolism (the main endpoint); an executive-function score was slightly better, but daily-function and global scores were not. Small and mostly negative.

01Findings

What the study reported

Drugs
Liraglutide
Dose
daily (up to 1.8 mg, full text)
Route
subcutaneous
Treatment duration
52 weeks
Comparator
placebo
Primary outcome
Change in cerebral glucose metabolic rate (FDG-PET)
Effect
Primary difference -0.17 (NS); ADAS-Exec 0.15 (unadjusted p=0.01); ADCS-ADL and CDR-SoB no difference
95% confidence interval
-0.39 to 0.06 (primary)
P value
0.14
Follow-up
52 weeks
Adverse events
Not extracted
Limitations
Auto-classified from abstract only; effect estimates, adverse events and limitations not extracted. Requires manual review.

Who was studied

Obesity status
not an entry criterion
Diabetes status
excluded (no diabetes)
Baseline condition
mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease syndrome
Sample size
204

Study quality details

Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Sample size
204
Randomization
yes
Blinding
double-blind
Comparator
placebo
Follow up duration
52 weeks
Outcome type
mixed
Replication
not assessed (auto)
Consistency with other evidence
not assessed (auto)
Population applicability
PARTIAL
Statistical precision
n=204; primary null; secondary unadjusted for multiplicity
Risk of bias
not assessed (auto)
Funding conflicts
no
Peer review status
yes
02Funding

Funding and conflicts

Funding
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation; Novo Nordisk supplied support (author disclosures list Novo Nordisk grants)
Industry funded
Partial
Manufacturer
Novo Nordisk
Sponsor role
Academic sponsor; drug/support from Novo Nordisk (verify).
Author conflicts
Lead author reports grants and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and others.
Independent replication
unknown
Notes
Authors declare relationships with the drug's manufacturer: Novo Nordisk

Funding is shown on every study and never used to score it.

03Claims

Claims this study bears on

04Source

The source, as retrieved

Abstract

Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonist and antidiabetic drug, has shown neuroprotective effects in animal models. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease syndrome. 'Evaluating liraglutide in Alzheimer's disease' (ELAD) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial in 204 participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease syndrome with no diabetes. Participants received daily injections of liraglutide or placebo for 52 weeks. They underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and detailed neuropsychometric evaluations. The primary outcome was a change in cerebral glucose metabolic rate. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability and cognitive changes. The primary outcome showed no significant differences in cerebral glucose metabolism (difference = -0.17; 95% confidence interval: -0.39 to 0.06; P = 0.14) between the two groups. The secondary outcome-score on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Executive domain (ADAS-Exec)-performed better in liraglutide-treated patients compared to placebo (0.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.28; unadjusted P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) (-0.58; 95% confidence interval: -3.13 to 1.97; unadjusted P = 0.65) or Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SoB) (-0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.57 to 0.44; unadjusted P = 0.81) scores. Liraglutide was generally safe and well tolerated in non-diabetic patients with Alzheimer's disease. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01843075 .

Where this record came from

SourceRetrievedIdentifier
pubmedSep 13, 202641326666
first ingestion