GLP-1 Evidence

Not medical advice. A record of published research and our assessments of it. The limits

Effect of Semaglutide Versus Placebo on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review

Design
Systematic review · 1463 participants · Mixed outcome
Match to healthy normal-weight adults aged 55–75
Different population[Auto] Synthesis of studies conducted predominantly in people with obesity/overweight.
Could weight loss explain it?
Possibly[Auto] Participants had obesity and/or type 2 diabetes and the abstract does not separate direct drug effects from weight loss or glycaemic improvement.
Study tier
Study tier 2[Auto] Systematic review/meta-analysis of randomized trials (auto-provisional; heterogeneity and included-study quality not assessed).
Assessment
Version 1 · automatic, not yet reviewed by a person · Sep 13, 2026

Study facts come from the paper. Population match, weight-loss explanation and study tier are our judgments, made against the reference group of healthy normal-weight adults aged 55–75.

[Auto, unreviewed; last sentences of abstract] These results suggest that semaglutide may be a promising treatment for HFpEF in obese patients, offering not only significant weight loss but also improvements in biomarkers and quality of life. Therefore, semaglutide appears to provide potential cardiovascular and metabolic benefits in addition to its established weight-reducing effects, although findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of included studies.

01Findings

What the study reported

Drugs
Semaglutide
Dose
2.4 mg once weekly
Comparator
placebo
Primary outcome
Not extracted
Effect
Not extracted
95% confidence interval
Not extracted
Follow-up
Not stated
Adverse events
Not extracted
Limitations
Auto-classified from abstract only; effect estimates, adverse events and limitations not extracted. Requires manual review.

Who was studied

Obesity status
obesity/overweight present (all or most)
Cvd status
cardiovascular disease present in population (see abstract)
Baseline condition
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Sample size
1463

Study quality details

Study design
Systematic review
Sample size
1463
Randomization
n/a
Blinding
not stated
Comparator
placebo
Follow up duration
not stated
Outcome type
mixed
Replication
not assessed (auto)
Consistency with other evidence
not assessed (auto)
Population applicability
INDIRECT
Statistical precision
not extracted
Risk of bias
not assessed (auto)
Funding conflicts
unclear
Peer review status
yes
02Funding

Funding and conflicts

Funding
not reported in abstract
Industry funded
Unclear
Manufacturer
None identified
Sponsor role
not reported in abstract
Author conflicts
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Independent replication
unknown

Funding is shown on every study and never used to score it.

04Source

The source, as retrieved

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a major global health concern and can be classified into different phenotypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), reduced ejection fraction, and mildly reduced ejection fraction. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of semaglutide compared to placebo in obese patients with HFpEF. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, relevant studies published from January 2021 to August 2024 were identified through searches in PubMed and Science Direct. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies were considered; however, only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective cohort ultimately met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 1463 participants with HFpEF and obesity. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for the retrospective cohort. In each study, participants were divided into two groups receiving either semaglutide or placebo. The findings after a 52-week follow-up showed that treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly resulted in a significant reduction in biomarkers associated with HF. Specifically, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) values decreased by 43% and 42% in the RCTs and 37% in the retrospective cohort. NT-proBNP levels declined by 20.90% and 23.20% in the RCTs and 15.80% in the cohort, compared to the placebo group. The reductions in CRP and NT-proBNP are clinically relevant, as elevated levels of these biomarkers are associated with worse outcomes in HFpEF. In addition, participants in the semaglutide group experienced a reduction in body weight ranging from 9% to 13% across the three studies, while those in the placebo group showed weight loss between 2% and 7% across the studies. Functional improvement was also observed, with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) increasing by 13 to 16 points in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo. These results suggest that semaglutide may be a promising treatment for HFpEF in obese patients, offering not only significant weight loss but also improvements in biomarkers and quality of life. Therefore, semaglutide appears to provide potential cardiovascular and metabolic benefits in addition to its established weight-reducing effects, although findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of included studies.

Where this record came from

SourceRetrievedIdentifier
pubmedSep 13, 202640605908
first ingestion