Efficacy and Safety of CagriSema for Metabolic Outcomes: Systematic Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Design
- Meta-analysis
- Drugs
- Semaglutide, Cagrisema
- Assessment
- Facts extracted automatically · reviewed by Carrie Schluter, Nov 5, 2026 · added Oct 18, 2026
This study was added automatically, and its details were extracted by machine rather than read off the paper by a person. Carrie Schluter has reviewed the record, but that review did not re-extract those details, so the collection still publishes no population match, weight-loss explanation, study tier, findings, population or funding details for it: a check of automatically extracted details found too many errors to show them as fact. The abstract below is the source as retrieved.
01Source
The source, as retrieved
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Overweight status, obesity, and diabetes represent significant socioeconomic burdens that require long-term management. [METHODS] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual-agonist CagriSema vs semaglutide monotherapy, cagrilintide monotherapy, and placebo in adults with overweight/obese status and type 2 diabetes, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to 14 June 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Separate pairwise meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. [RESULTS] Eight RCTs comprising 6898 participants were included. CagriSema was associated with significantly greater percentage body weight reduction compared to semaglutide [MD -6.60%; 95%CI: -8.51 to -4.68; P<0.0001; I2 =82%], cagrilintide [MD -8.15%; 95%CI: -11.40 to -4.89; P<0.0001; I2 =95%], and placebo [MD -14.30%; 95%CI: -17.41 to -11.19; P<0.0001; I2 =99%]. A greater decrease in the percentage of glycated hemoglobin was also observed for CagriSema than for semaglutide [MD -0.09%; 95%CI: -0.14 to -0.04; P=0.0004; I2 =39%], cagrilintide [MD -0.87%; 95% CI -1.48 to -0.26; p = 0.005; I2 = 97%], and placebo [MD -1.55%; 95% CI -2.14 to -0.97; p < 0.0001; I2 = 99%]. Furthermore, CagriSema achieved significantly greater reductions in absolute body weight, waist circumference and body mass index across all comparators (all p < 0.0001). CagriSema demonstrated better blood pressure control compared with cagrilintide and placebo, with effects comparable to those of semaglutide. Moreover, CagriSema significantly decreased C-reactive protein and improved lipid profiles compared with cagrilintide and placebo. CagriSema increased any adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events compared with all comparators. Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed in several continuous outcomes, driven by diverse baseline clinical characteristics and background therapies. [CONCLUSION] Compared with current standard monotherapies and placebos, CagriSema demonstrates superior weight loss, glucose, and lipid control. Key limitations include the relatively small number of eligible trials and the current lack of long-term cardiovascular endpoints.
Where this record came from
| Source | Retrieved | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| pubmed | Sep 20, 2026 | 42763732 first ingestion |
| pubmed | Sep 20, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Sep 20, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Sep 27, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Sep 27, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Sep 27, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Oct 4, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Oct 4, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Oct 4, 2026 | 42763732 duplicate matched on doi |
| owner-review | Nov 6, 2026 | reviewed_by set to Carrie Schluter (2026-11-05) on the owner's own confirmation. The assessment is unchanged and still the auto-classifier's, so its extracted values stay withheld under the 2026-10-18 decision. |