Efficacy and safety of mazdutide vs. dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Design
- Meta-analysis
- Drugs
- Dulaglutide, Mazdutide
- Assessment
- Facts extracted automatically · reviewed by Carrie Schluter, Nov 5, 2026 · added Oct 25, 2026
This study was added automatically, and its details were extracted by machine rather than read off the paper by a person. Carrie Schluter has reviewed the record, but that review did not re-extract those details, so the collection still publishes no population match, weight-loss explanation, study tier, findings, population or funding details for it: a check of automatically extracted details found too many errors to show them as fact. The abstract below is the source as retrieved.
01Source
The source, as retrieved
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked to obesity and carries a high risk of metabolic complications. While GLP-1 receptor agonists like dulaglutide improve blood sugar and support modest weight loss, many patients do not reach their treatment goals. Mazdutide, a dual GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, may offer stronger metabolic benefits. [OBJECTIVE] To compare the efficacy and safety of mazdutide versus dulaglutide in adults with T2DM. [METHODS] We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing mazdutide and dulaglutide. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and achievement of glycemic and weight-loss targets. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE. [RESULTS] Three trials met inclusion criteria. Mazdutide led to greater reductions in HbA1c (- 0.25%) and body weight (- 2.97 kg) compared with dulaglutide. Patients were more likely to achieve HbA1c < 7.0%, ≥ 5% weight loss, and the combined target of ≥ 5% weight loss with HbA1c < 7.0%. Fasting plasma glucose was numerically but not significantly improved. Mazdutide was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects and decreased appetite, with a non-significant numerical increase in hypoglycemia, while serious adverse events and discontinuations were similar between treatments. Glycemic and major weight outcomes were supported by high-certainty evidence; most safety outcomes were moderate-certainty. [CONCLUSIONS] Mazdutide, based on evidence from three RCTs, provides preliminary evidence of meaningful improvements in blood sugar control and weight loss compared with dulaglutide, though with an increased risk of mostly manageable gastrointestinal effects; given the limited number of trials, these findings should be considered preliminary and supporting its potential role as a promising dual-action therapy for T2DM management, pending confirmation in larger, longer-term trials.
Where this record came from
| Source | Retrieved | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| pubmed | Oct 25, 2026 | 42897592 first ingestion |
| pubmed | Nov 1, 2026 | 42897592 duplicate matched on doi |
| owner-review | Nov 6, 2026 | reviewed_by set to Carrie Schluter (2026-11-05) on the owner's own confirmation. The assessment is unchanged and still the auto-classifier's, so its extracted values stay withheld under the 2026-10-18 decision. |