GLP-1 Evidence

Not medical advice. A record of published research and our assessments of it. The limits

Suitability of the ICH S1B(R1) Weight-of-Evidence Framework to Evaluate Glucagon-Like Protein-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1RA) Carcinogenicity Risk

Design
Animal study
Drugs
Semaglutide, Liraglutide, Dulaglutide, Exenatide, Lixisenatide, Albiglutide, Tirzepatide
Assessment
Not yet reviewed by a person · added Sep 27, 2026

This study was added automatically and has not been reviewed. Until it is, the collection publishes no population match, weight-loss explanation, study tier, findings, population or funding details for it: a check of automatically extracted details found too many errors to show them as fact. The abstract below is the source as retrieved.

01Source

The source, as retrieved

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are an established treatment for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. While these agents provide clinical benefits, chronic rodent bioassays have shown a consistent increase in thyroid C-cell tumors, raising regulatory concerns for human carcinogenicity risk and resulting in a boxed warning for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). However, the human relevance of the rodent tumors is unclear due to species differences in GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) biology. Carcinogenicity testing of pharmaceuticals is described in ICH S1 guidelines. ICH S1B(R1) outlines experimental approaches to carcinogenicity evaluation including a weight-of-evidence (WoE) framework to determine whether long-term rat carcinogenicity studies add value to human cancer risk assessments. This manuscript applies that framework across seven approved GLP-1RAs: lixisenatide, exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide, and albiglutide, to evaluate the relevance of rodent thyroid tumors and the utility of 2-year bioassays for this drug class. Across all six WoE domains, the evidence supports concluding that GLP1-RAs are tumorigenic in rats via a known human-irrelevant mechanism. Thus, within the S1B(R1) WoE framework, future carcinogenicity testing in rats is unlikely to provide additional value for regulatory decision-making for this class of pharmaceuticals.

Where this record came from

SourceRetrievedIdentifier
pubmedSep 27, 202642800499
first ingestion
pubmedSep 27, 202642800499
duplicate matched on doi
pubmedOct 4, 202642800499
duplicate matched on doi
pubmedOct 4, 202642800499
duplicate matched on doi
pubmedOct 11, 202642800499
duplicate matched on doi
pubmedOct 11, 202642800499
duplicate matched on doi