Dose-response and time-course effects of ecnoglutide in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy
- Design
- Meta-analysis
- Drugs
- Dulaglutide
- Assessment
- Facts extracted automatically · reviewed by Carrie Schluter, Nov 5, 2026 · added Nov 6, 2026
This study was added automatically, and its details were extracted by machine rather than read off the paper by a person. Carrie Schluter has reviewed the record, but that review did not re-extract those details, so the collection still publishes no population match, weight-loss explanation, study tier, findings, population or funding details for it: a check of automatically extracted details found too many errors to show them as fact. The abstract below is the source as retrieved.
01Source
The source, as retrieved
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Ecnoglutide, a novel long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, is considered a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of diabetes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ecnoglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes and to further investigate its dose-time relationship. [METHODS] This study followed the PRISMA guidelines and systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, with the search updated through February 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing ecnoglutide with placebo or the active control, dulaglutide, were included. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c (%). Secondary outcomes included FPG, PPG, 7-point SMBG, body weight, adverse events, and serious adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Meta-analyses employed a random-effects model, and mean differences and risk ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. [RESULTS] Three randomized controlled trials involving 977 participants were included. Compared with placebo, ecnoglutide significantly reduced HbA1c (MD = -1.40, 95% CI -1.65, -1.14, p < 0.00001), FPG (MD = -1.98, 95% CI -2.34, -1.63, p < 0.00001), PPG (MD = -4.88, 95% CI -6.32, -3.44, p < 0.00001), and body weight (MD = -2.16, 95% CI -2.62, -1.71, p < 0.00001). Additionally, compared with the placebo group, the incidence of adverse events was higher in the ecnoglutide group (OR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.24-3.32, p = 0.005), while there was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events. Dose-response analysis showed that ecnoglutide exhibited a clear dose-dependent relationship for HbA1c, FPG, and body weight at doses ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 mg, while PPG was less affected by dose. Time-response analysis indicated that the hypoglycemic efficacy of ecnoglutide peaked around week 35 and subsequently plateaued, whereas body weight exhibited a sustained linear downward trend. [CONCLUSION] Ecnoglutide significantly improved glycemic control and reduced body weight, although it was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events without increasing serious adverse events. Despite these promising findings, the evidence remains limited and requires confirmation in larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials. [SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261327235, identifier CRD420261327235.
Where this record came from
| Source | Retrieved | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| pubmed | Sep 27, 2026 | 42798476 first ingestion |
| pubmed | Oct 4, 2026 | 42798476 duplicate matched on doi |
| pubmed | Oct 11, 2026 | 42798476 duplicate matched on doi |
| owner-review | Nov 6, 2026 | reviewed_by set to Carrie Schluter (2026-11-05) on the owner's own confirmation. The assessment is unchanged and still the auto-classifier's, so its extracted values stay withheld under the 2026-10-18 decision. |
| reextract | Nov 6, 2026 | dose: '1.2 mg' -> None. Q-043: manufacturer and drug_details.dose re-extracted by auto-classifier-v1.2. manufacturer no longer reads companies named only in the authors' conflicts statement (IN-062) and refuses a multi-company roster; dose is tied to the GLP-1 agent by name, never reads a concentration, and records a multi-dose design whole. Every other value is carried forward unchanged. Owner decision IN-064 option 1, 2026-11-06. |