GLP-1 Evidence

Not medical advice. A record of published research and our assessments of it. The limits

Genetically Proxied GIP-GIPR Pathway Perturbation and Fracture Risk

Design
Mendelian randomization
Drugs
Class unspecified
Assessment
Not yet reviewed by a person · added Oct 18, 2026

This study was added automatically and has not been reviewed. Until it is, the collection publishes no population match, weight-loss explanation, study tier, findings, population or funding details for it: a check of automatically extracted details found too many errors to show them as fact. The abstract below is the source as retrieved.

01Source

The source, as retrieved

Abstract

[AIMS] To determine whether genetic proxies for incretin pathway perturbation are associated with fracture risk and bone mineral density, providing human genetic evidence relevant to the skeletal safety of incretin-based therapies. [MATERIALS AND METHODS] We conducted drug-target Mendelian randomisation using cis genetic variants near GIP, GIPR, GCG, GLP1R in 401 983 unrelated UK Biobank participants. Instruments were scaled to 1 kg/m2 lower BMI or 1 mmol/mol lower HbA1c. Outcomes included fractures at major osteoporotic sites, combined spine-and-hip fractures, site-specific fractures and estimated bone mineral density (eBMD). We compared these estimates with genome-wide liability to lower BMI or HbA1c to contextualise the fracture associations observed for the target-proximal instruments. We used Cox models to estimate time-to-fracture associations per SD of target genetic risk score aligned to lower BMI or HbA1c. [RESULTS] GIP-GIPR perturbation was associated with lower odds of fractures at major osteoporotic sites when scaled to lower BMI (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98) or lower HbA1c. Associations were similar for combined spine-and-hip fractures under both scaling approaches (OR 0.68, 0.49-0.94). Genome-wide liability to lower BMI or HbA1c did not show the same fracture associations as GIP-GIPR perturbation. GCG-GLP1R estimates were imprecise. Genetically proxied incretin pathway perturbation was not associated with eBMD. In Cox analyses, GIP-GIPR genetic risk score was associated with lower risk of fractures at major osteoporotic sites (HR 0.976, 0.959-0.992) and combined spine-and-hip fractures (HR 0.971, 0.946-0.996). [CONCLUSIONS] Human genetic evidence suggests an association between genetically proxied GIP-GIPR pathway perturbation and lower fracture risk, supporting fracture-focused evaluation of GIPR-targeting therapies in clinical and post-marketing studies.

Where this record came from

SourceRetrievedIdentifier
pubmedOct 4, 202642811415
first ingestion
pubmedOct 11, 202642811415
duplicate matched on doi